Michael Zheng vs Mitchell Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Oct at 11:23 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Zheng vs M. Krueger

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zheng 1 - 0 Krueger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Michael Zheng winning 2 and Mitchell Krueger winning 0. The last match between Michael Zheng and Mitchell Krueger was at the Tiburon Challenger, 03-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Michael Zheng getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zheng | 1 |
| Krueger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Tiburon Challenger(10-03-25)
M. Zheng vs M. Krueger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $102,200 | Career Prize Money | $1,082,108 |
| 65.09% (69-37) | Career Total W/L | 52.68% (452-406) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
M. Zheng vs M. Krueger Match Preview:
- Mitchell Krueger has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, winning 47.03% of points compared to Michael Zheng's 44.72%. Is this a key factor? Yes, as there's a strong link between this stat and match outcomes.
- Both players show competent return game stats, with Krueger leading in winning 45.73% of opponent's second serve points, eclipsing Zheng's 42.23%.
- When it comes to handling pressure, Zheng demonstrates better breakpoint saving with a rate of 56.82%, whereas Krueger saves 53.99%.
- In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Zheng significantly outperforms Krueger, winning 76.47% of his matches as opposed to Krueger's 41.82%.
- Krueger excels on clay with a win rate of 56%, while Zheng prefers indoor hard courts, also securing a 56% victory rate.
- Despite having faced stronger opponents on average (ranked 244.98), Krueger has a lower overall match success rate compared to Zheng, who played against slightly less competitive opponents (ranked 269.91).
- In deciding sets, Zheng shows superior resilience, winning 71% of such situations, whereas Krueger wins 50%.
- Both players frequent the Challenger/ITF circuits, yet Zheng boasts a higher win percentage, 79.31%, compared to Krueger's 46.88%.
- Neither has a favorable career record on grass, with both preferring different surfaces for their strengths.
Editorial Prediction (October 3, 2025, UTC):
As we approach this match, Mitchell Krueger's slight advantage in recent second serve and return performance may prove beneficial. These aspects are important for a match prediction given their correlation with player success.
However, Michael Zheng's remarkable consistency and higher match win percentage over the past year showcase his impressive form and competitiveness. Zheng's superior breakpoint saving ability under pressure and higher success rate in deciding sets further bolster his case as a strong competitor.
Considering that Michael Zheng excels with a 76.47% winning rate in matches, compared to Krueger's 41.82%, alongside his ability to withstand pressure effectively, Zheng appears more equipped to secure a victory in this encounter.
Therefore, based on these factors, Michael Zheng is most likely to win the upcoming tennis match.
Michael Zheng vs Mitchell Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Zheng vs M. Krueger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:47:26 | Average Match Time | 1:47:26 |
| 61% (46/76) | 1st Serve % | 73% (63/86) |
| 65% (30/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (37/63) |
| 53% (16/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 48% (41/86) | Return Points Win % | 39% (30/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Zheng Recent Matches Played
M. Krueger Recent Matches Played

M. Zheng vs M. Krueger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.09% (69/37) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.68% (452/406) |
| 62.76% (150/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.72% (1067/957) |
| 54.57% (1224/1019) | Games Win/Loss | 51.11% (9901/9472) |
| 67.14% (47/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.56% (278/241) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.11% (124/97) |
| 66.67% (10/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.44% (40/50) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.71% (10/18) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 360 | Aces Total | 3012 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 173 | Total Double Faults | 1729 |
| 1:27:33 | Average Match Time | 1:24:11 |
| 412.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.48 |
| 58% (3503/6091) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31053/50142) |
| 72% (2530/3503) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (21477/31053) |
| 52% (1358/2588) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9687/19089) |
| 43% (287/670) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1884/4583) |
| 41% (2644/6412) | Return Points Win % | 38% (19447/50710) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 46.03% (29/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 36.36% (12/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 48.00% (36/39) |
| 68.52% (37/17) | Challenger W/L | 49.80% (248/250) |
| 63.83% (30/17) | Futures W/L | 67.20% (127/62) |
| 65% (69/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (441/841) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 48% (11/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (134/294) |
| 56% (15/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (136/299) |
| 95% (65/62) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (459/374) |
| 5% (65/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (459/85) |
| 17% (41/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (399/74) |